WunnCheck helps people who work in Luxembourg compare where to live across Luxembourg, France, Germany and Belgium: housing, commute, telework and estimated monthly budget. We are proposing a limited pilot to relocation providers, employers, recruitment platforms and payroll advisers. No partnership is active today.
Someone accepting a job in Luxembourg has to weigh four possible countries of residence. The relevant information — rents, commutes, treaty tax thresholds, telework share, net budget — is scattered and does not line up naturally.
Luxembourg, France, Germany and Belgium offer very different balances of housing cost, commute time and telework headroom. Comparing all four consistently is difficult because housing, commute, telework and review requirements follow different assumptions.
The treaty tax threshold, the telework share for social security and the monthly budget follow separate logics. Mixing them up produces bad decisions or unfounded worries.
Relocation consultants, HR teams and payroll advisers often answer the same basic orientation questions before they can work on the real individual case.
WunnCheck provides structured orientation and review flags. Individual advice — tax, payroll, legal, mortgage or relocation — remains the work of qualified partners.
A comparison framework to share with supported employees, so the first meeting starts from a structured scenario instead of a blank page.
A self-orientation aid for new cross-border hires, with clear flags on the cases that deserve an HR, payroll or legal review.
Useful orientation content for candidates hesitating over a Luxembourg offer because of the where-to-live question.
Potentially better-framed questions when a client chooses to share their scenario: explicit assumptions, flagged thresholds and a sharper scope from the first conversation.
The journey stays deliberately simple. Each step separates what is estimated from what must be verified officially.
Salary, family situation, housing, telework rhythm and commute. Inputs stay in the user's browser.
Luxembourg, France, Germany and Belgium compared in three separate reads: treaty tax exposure, social security and disposable budget.
Thresholds approached or exceeded, possible A1 procedure, cases outside the standard scope: the tool calmly flags what needs a human review.
If the user requests follow-up, WunnCheck can help structure the next conversation. The user decides what information to share; no calculator case is automatically sent to a partner.
This is a proposed framework, not an existing programme: no pilot is running, no partner is committed and no results have been measured. The exact scope is defined with each partner before anything starts.
These are evaluation questions, not results. No conversion, satisfaction or time-saving figures exist today.
Proposed evaluation method: voluntary feedback from invited users, voluntary partner feedback, a manual pilot review and aggregated observations supplied intentionally by the pilot partner. The public site uses no background tracking, and no calculator inputs are collected for pilot measurement. Adding analytics or further instrumentation would require a separate privacy review and explicit disclosure before use.
Comparison inputs (salary, housing, commute, telework) are processed locally in the user's browser. The public site code contains no storage of these inputs, no analytics script and no user accounts.
The contact form is a separate processing step: submitted details are transmitted via Formspree to the operator's mailbox, as described in the privacy notice. Nothing is sent without a deliberate user action.
Before any public partner listing, WunnCheck must define the handoff process, compliance boundaries and commercial model. No partner is displayed before that framing exists.
The tone stays deliberately non-committal until those points are settled.
Describe your context — client type, volume of cross-border cases, the form of collaboration you have in mind. We reply to scope a conversation, with no commitment on either side.